|The Market is Like the NBA|
The Market is Like the NBA
Hear me out. I was not drinking. Much. Let’s start with the National Basketball Association. Before the season started there was labor strife, a change in ownership of a team to one owned by the league and later sold to an NFL owner of a franchise in the same city. There are structural changes in the offing for the league in general.
Fans have had a love/hate relationship with one of the leading teams, the Miami Heat. They can do no wrong, they can do no good, yet they are front and center regardless. The most aged teams, the San Antonio Spurs and Boston Celtics nearly defied all odds and made it to the NBA Finals. A venerable team (Los Angeles Lakers) with weak leadership at the top (coach) and the best player with no supporting cast (Kobe Bryant) fell apart before our very eyes. A new guard, an up-and coming team, the Oklahoma City Thunder, has reached the Finals sooner than anyone expected, showing some real moxie.
As for the stock market, we always hear about bulls and bears. However, it is more than that nowadays, thanks in large part to the media. Like in wrestling and everything else written about in the media, the market is now led by stocks that are good and stocks (or companies) that are evil. Makes for good copy, right?
The stock market commentary has gone from analytical to new vs. old and good vs. evil, with the occasional restructuring talk. The evil ones are easy to identify. They are basically divided in two groups. One group, the investment banks and banks is the source of many of our problems according to the mainstream financial media. Frankly, I don’t care. If I can make money on the stocks, that will be my primary motivation, not ideology, perceived or otherwise. The other is the 800 lb. gorilla. In this case it is led by Facebook (NASDAQ—FB) with Google (NASDAQ—GOOG) a close second. FB, of course, tried to screw investors, and has a cult following of massive proportions. GOOG, also with a huge following due to functionality, is derided for its practices as well, yet lauded for its basic uses and wide-reaching offerings that aid our daily productivity. Who is the good guy?
Ironically, until public, it is the private firms, unless one is crowned as such while public by the media. If I had to choose, I’d say that the good vs. evil battle that is looming in a steel cage match is Twitter vs. Facebook. And doesn’t it seem like the Heat is Facebook and Twitter is the Thunder? Users love Twitter. It does business the right way. It is useful and cool, smooth. Facebook is LeBron. It anointed itself king and we all piled on until it made us puke. (Apple is in its own category.)
The old guard in the market is represented by the venerable names we always write off in this New Economy like those that have stumbled in tech such as Yahoo (NASDAQ –YHOO), HP (NYSE— HPQ), Nokia (NYSE—NOK), etc. (See San Antonio and Boston). Changes in leadership have not helped, they have one thing going for them and still can’t succeed. Right, Kobe?
The old guard in the market is represented by the venerable names we always write off in this New Economy yet who seem to provide steady returns somehow.
With changes in contracts, age limits, and other potential restructurings, it is reminiscent of the stock market’s attempt to return to a greater semblance of order where the inmates are not running the asylum. Yet, others are given some greater freedoms to succeed. (See future impact of JOBS Act on the market in 2 years.)
Last week, we said don’t worry, don’t buy early. We were on target as the market had its best week, and it didn’t start until Wednesday. It was driven by fewer European concerns, and it is possible this is, as we say in football, a false start. Still, keep dipping those toes in the water. As summer heats up, you will want to be all in.
Select Research: These Stocks are Rockin’…
I could have predicted this. Last week, we reminded you to visit our site daily or follow us on Twitter as we are blogging every day under our Market Monitor blogs between 10:30 AM and 11:30 AM. Our blogs typically include a current or soon to be hot stock on NASDAQ or NYSE and NYSE AMEX. Here is what you missed:
Parametric Sound (NASDAQ—PAMT—$8.75) jumped 46% in 3 days. It made almost its entire move higher after we tweeted our blog post.
Reed’s (NASDAQ—REED - $3.31) almost reached our back-of-the-envelope target in 2 days, and was up 21% before dropping. Again, we were early on this. No news, just our analysis.
Tix Corporation: (NYSEAMEX—TIX—$2.00) received a tender offer from its Chairman for an all-cash buy-out at $2.25. If it goes through, it is only a 12.5% gain, but that is not bad from here, is it? If it is not approved, stock probably goes higher anyway.
We are certified Seeking Alpha contributors and after we put out a negative piece on Sirius XM (NASDAQ—SIRI—$1.86) we got 10,000 page views in a few hours and were attacked by its cultish followers. Hilarious. Stock dropped roughly 3%, after the post and tweet, while NASDAQ was up 3.6% for the week.
We would not recommend chasing PAMT or REED this week, but TIXC is an interesting play. Don’t forget to check out the blogs daily so you don't miss these great trades. We featured 6 stocks, and the ones we were negative on dropped while the positive profiled stocks all rose.
And most importantly, you must sign up early this week for The 30-30 Report. One of our features hit a new 52-week high (3rd one in 2 weeks) and the stocks are looking great. Plus, the first edition of The Analyst Call will take place on Thursday. We will be interviewing a well-known stock market expert and make this interview, which will include his exclusive picks and ideas, available only to our premium subscribers.
Until next week…
Analyst: Robert Goldman
It is important to note that while we may track performance separately, we utilize the same coverage criteria in determining coverage of all stocks in both research formats. Please view the company’s individual disclosures for each engagement, which can be found in each company-specific report. All information contained in this newsletter and in our reports were provided by the Companies or generated from our own due diligence. Our analysts are responsible only to the public, and are paid in advance to eliminate pecuniary interests, retain editorial control, and ensure independence. Analysts are compensated on a per report basis and not on the basis of his/her recommendations.
The information used and statements of fact made have been obtained from sources considered reliable but we neither guarantee nor represent the completeness or accuracy. Goldman Small Cap Research did not make an independent investigation or inquiry as to the accuracy of any information provided by the Company, or other firms. Goldman Small Cap Research relied solely upon information provided by the Company through its filings, press releases, presentations, and through its own internal due diligence for accuracy and completeness. Such information and the opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. A Goldman Small Cap Research report, note, or newsletter is not intended as an offering, recommendation, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned or discussed.
This report or newsletter does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any particular person. This report or newsletter does not provide all information material to an investor’s decision about whether or not to make any investment. Any discussion of risks in this presentation is not a disclosure of all risks or a complete discussion of the risks mentioned. Neither Goldman Small Cap Research, nor its parent, is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser with the FINRA or with any state securities regulatory authority.
ALL INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT OR NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMISSIBLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, TWO TRIANGLE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE QUALITY, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, RELIABILITY OR TIMELINESS OF THIS INFORMATION, OR FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES THAT MAY ARISE OUT OF THE USE OF THIS INFORMATION BY YOU OR ANYONE ELSE (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF OPPORTUNITIES, TRADING LOSSES, AND DAMAGES THAT MAY RESULT FROM ANY INACCURACY OR INCOMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION). TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TWO TRIANGLE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE UNDER ANY TORT, CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, PRODUCTS LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION.
For more information, visit our Disclaimer: www.goldmanresearch.com.