|The Goldman Guide: A Groupon Story and New Nuvilex Report|
Deceptive Numbers, Part II
In last week’s edition, we referenced how deceptive numbers can be. Little did we know how relevant the topic of questionable accounting would be just a few days later. Late last week, Groupon, the someday-to-be-public “deal-of-the-day” website that offers discounted gift certificates for featured products and services, was forced to restate its revenue (meaning reduce) by over 50% when the SEC commented that its method of booking revenue was, well, flawed. On second thought, a restatement/reduction by more than 50% is more than flawed.
I rarely call out companies for issues like this. Perhaps I should more often. Here is what happened. When the Company filed its original registration statement in June 2011, the financials reflected revenue growth from $30.5 million in 2009 to $713.4 million in 2010, and $664.7 million in the first quarter of 2011.
Unbelievable. Crack-smoking, right?
To be candid, I really did not pay much attention to the filing or news of it when it occurred. I have now and I am pissed.
Apparently, when Groupon would sell a gift certificate, it would book the entire amount as revenue, including what was sent to the owner, rather than just the commission itself. After the regulators at the SEC scrutinized this method, Groupon has now restated the previous figures to reflect the commission, rather than the total value of the gift certificate.
As a result, the 2010 revenue figure is now officially $312.9, rather than $713.4, a 56% decline.
I am not a CPA, nor have I been a CFO of a publicly traded firm. However, this move by management took cojones. Groupon is a really cool middleman but it makes nothing. It is a distributor or broker, if you will.
Therefore, the revenue it booked should always have been the commission, not the stated total value of the transaction.
How obvious can you get? After all, considering the huge decline in revenue due to the restatement illustrates this. Since they produce nothing and provide a service, it begs the question: Why did it take the SEC to open management’s eyes?
Let’s be clear. I am not claiming the Company committed fraud, or attempted to deceive anyone. This was the accounting method they used, auditors signed off on it. Perfectly legal. But is it right?
No, I say. Statistics and absolute figures are presented in manipulated form all the time. But if the sales growth is so incredible what is the need to, in effect double it? Clearly this growth would provide a high valuation.
I guess management and the board felt that by utilizing the perfectly satisfactory (though now proven incorrect) accounting method, it would help justify the huge losses and a real, crack-smoking valuation.
Here’s what I don’t get. We have seen this before. At least I have. And I am not speaking of the Enrons, Tycos, etc. of the world. No, I am talking about an obscure penny stock from the late 1980’s/early 1990’s, called Action Staffing, Inc. It was an employee leasing company which saw revenue rise from $25 million to over $200 million in 4 years. At its peak, I believe that the Company had over 11,000 “employees.”
This was not the type of staffing company like the one owned by Baltimore Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti.
Action Staffing routinely made top lists, in major magazines like Inc., as one of the fastest growing firms in the country. However, the revenue was in fact the salaries of the employees, rather than the commissions made on these leased employees.
Action Staffing eventually went bust because of losses, and tax and other fraud purveyed by its founder.
I am not saying that Groupon will follow in these footsteps or that anyone in management has done anything wrong.
But this whole mess is such a shame because all of this was so unnecessary. It is growing like a weed, has millions of fans, etc. But, a black mark like this leaves a bad taste in investors’ mouths and bad memories full of complete distrust in leading companies.
Who knows when Groupon goes public, the valuation it will be afforded, and how it will be received. I suspect they shot themselves in the foot, and overreached instead of being prudent.
For all of us, let it be a lesson. If it seems too good to be true (revenue growth for example,) it probably is.
Better Than Advertised
It has been a while since we have written on Nuvilex, Inc. (NVLX – OTCQB.) The stock has for the most part, been solid. As it has hung around the $0.05 range for the past few months while the market has dropped substantially.
What prompted our latest report, was further due diligence on SG Austria, ahead of the closing of its acquisition by Nuvilex.
As noted in the report, SG Austria is better than advertised and we reiterate our Speculative Buy rating and $0.50 price target. Here are some highlights:
The deal should close in October 2011. Once it closes, we expect the stock to move substantially higher.
The broad applications for the Company’s technology include treatment of multiple cancers, enhanced stem cell implementation, and the treatment of life-threatening viral infections. Additional applications under development provide even more shots on goal for this innovative delivery system pioneer.
The combined firms have leveraged their technologies to execute a total of at least five clinical and preclinical trials.
Now that we have had an opportunity to perform due diligence, we believe that Nuvilex is worth $0.20 today just on the oncology, stem cells and anti-viral therapies alone, and $0.25 for the total company.
May the market treat you well this last week of September.
Until next week….
Analyst: Robert Goldman
It is important to note that while we may track performance separately, we utilize the same coverage criteria in determining coverage of all stocks in both research formats. Please view the company’s individual disclosures for each engagement, which can be found in each company-specific report. All information contained in this newsletter and in our reports were provided by the Companies or generated from our own due diligence. Nuvilex, Inc. has compensated Goldman Small Cap Research $8,000 for a three month research services subscription. Our analysts are responsible only to the public, and are paid in advance to eliminate pecuniary interests, retain editorial control, and ensure independence. Analysts are compensated on a per report basis and not on the basis of his/her recommendations.
The information used and statements of fact made have been obtained from sources considered reliable but we neither guarantee nor represent the completeness or accuracy. Goldman Small Cap Research did not make an independent investigation or inquiry as to the accuracy of any information provided by the Company, or other firms. Goldman Small Cap Research relied solely upon information provided by the Company through its filings, press releases, presentations, and through its own internal due diligence for accuracy and completeness. Such information and the opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. A Goldman Small Cap Research report, note, or newsletter is not intended as an offering, recommendation, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned or discussed.
This report or newsletter does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any particular person. This report or newsletter does not provide all information material to an investor’s decision about whether or not to make any investment. Any discussion of risks in this presentation is not a disclosure of all risks or a complete discussion of the risks mentioned. Neither Goldman Small Cap Research, nor its parent, is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory authority.
ALL INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT OR NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMISSIBLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, TWO TRIANGLE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE QUALITY, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, RELIABILITY OR TIMELINESS OF THIS INFORMATION, OR FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES THAT MAY ARISE OUT OF THE USE OF THIS INFORMATION BY YOU OR ANYONE ELSE (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF OPPORTUNITIES, TRADING LOSSES, AND DAMAGES THAT MAY RESULT FROM ANY INACCURACY OR INCOMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION). TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TWO TRIANGLE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE UNDER ANY TORT, CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, PRODUCTS LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION.
For more information, visit our Disclaimer: www.goldmanresearch.com.