|Written by GSCR Staff|
|Thursday, 05 December 2013 09:18|
December 2013 Federal Reserve Policy Outlook
Mark Twain said, “The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.”
Similarly, the Federal Reserve Board’s reaction to recent news by the Fourth Estate might be, “The reports of US economic growth have been greatly exaggerated.”
For example, a New York Times Economy Chronology on November 27, 2013 follows:
“Commerce Department reports home building permits jumped 6.2 percent in October, to their highest point in more than five years; Standard & Poor's Case-Sheller composite index of single-family home prices rose 13.3 percent in September from a year earlier.”
Reuters published an even rosier picture on this myopic piece of data, suggesting that, “Some economists, however, said the strong housing data, combined with better-than-expected October employment and retail sales reports, increased the possibility that the Fed could begin tapering its bond purchases as early as December.”
Not to be outdone, Marketwatch’s headline of New U.S. home sales leap 25.4% in October implies that the economy is already on a stronger footing.
Nevertheless, the Fed voted 9-to-1 on Oct. 30 to continue the $85 billion-per-month asset-purchase program, also known as QE3. It further made few changes to the language in its statement. If tapering were so imminent, wouldn’t you expect the vote to be much closer?
What could our monetary policymakers be thinking?
The following insight at http://viableopposition.blogspot.ca/2013/12/a-different-perspective-on-sales-of-new.html shows a different perspective on these data.
“You can see how the current residential real estate market in the United States can hardly be termed "healthy". Ignoring the rather anomalous rise in sales between the years 2000 and 2006 (aka the housing bubble), it is clear that the number of new single family home sales is still extremely depressed. In fact, July's sales level of 390,000 homes was the 74th worst month on record out of all 608 monthly data points since January 1963. To show you just how bad the housing market was during 2009 - 2011, of the 608 monthly data points, the top 22 worst months for new single family home sales were found during that timeframe. As well, at the beginning of 1963 when the population of the United States was only 188 million compared to today's 317 million, 591,000 new homes were sold on an annual basis, 170,000 more homes than were sold in August 2013.”
Recent reports of the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book findings appear to characterize national economic activity as "modest to moderate," as it did in October. Fortunately, our policymakers in the Fed appear to have a more balanced view of the economy, even as they consider alternative plans of action to the possibilities of different scenarios unfolding.
Marketwatch observed in a November 20, 2013 article, titled, “Federal Reserve weighs slowing bond buys soon,” ‘Minutes from the Oct. 29-30 meeting showed that officials considered reducing the size of the asset-purchase program even “before an unambiguous further improvement in the [labor-market] outlook was apparent.” And “many members” — by members, the Fed is referring to voters — “stressed the data-dependent nature of the current asset purchase program, and some pointed out that, if economic conditions warranted, the committee could decide to slow the pace of purchases at one of its next few meetings.”’ http://www.marketwatch.com/column/the-fed
If that observation were true, why would the markets appear to be so skittish this week in anticipation of a strong jobs report this Friday?
The December Beige Book says, "Hiring showed a modest increase or was unchanged across Districts… Difficulty with finding qualified workers, especially for high-skilled positions, was frequently reported. Upward pressure on wages and overall price inflation were contained. Contacts in many Districts voiced concern about future cost increases attributable to the Affordable Care Act and other types of federal regulation." http://www.businessinsider.com/federal-reserve-beige-book-december-2013-12#ixzz2mXFgoWLe
If structural unemployment is such a major challenge facing our country today, than I don’t see how tapering is going to help reduce unemployment. Indeed, it seems likely to have the opposite effect. One of the duties outlined in the Federal Reserve’s Mission Statement is “conducting the nation's monetary policy by influencing the monetary and credit conditions in the economy in pursuit of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.” Clearly, the Fed does not have the tools, nor should it, to retrain our workforce so the Fed can realize maximum employment. The nonprofit and private sectors appear to be addressing structural unemployment in part with new online training programs to enable motivated workers to qualify for highly skilled positions.
At the same time, I have a hard time believing that the Fed plans any kind of tapering so long as some members of Congress could act so capricious and whimsical to cause a default on federal government debt. Another government shutdown is possible in the first quarter of 2014 too. If you were a policymaker at the Fed, would you vote for tapering at this time?
Have a great day!
Disclosure: Goldman Small Cap Research analysts are neither long nor short these shares but may elect to purchase the stock within the next 48 hours.
This Market Monitor blog was prepared for informational purposes only. Goldman Small Cap Research, (a division of Two Triangle Consulting Group, LLC) produces research via two formats: Goldman Select Research, which typically highlights small cap companies, and Goldman Opportunity Research, which features micro cap companies in a sponsored research format. Thus, the Select product reflects the Firm’s internally generated stock ideas while the Opportunity product reflects sponsored research reports.
Goldman Small Cap Research is not affiliated in any way with Goldman Sachs & Co.
It is important to note that while we may track performance separately, we utilize the same coverage criteria in determining coverage of all stocks in both research formats. Please view the company’s individual disclosures for each engagement, which can be found in each company-specific report. All information contained in this blog, newsletter and in our reports were provided by the Companies or generated from our own due diligence. Our analysts are responsible only to the public, and are paid in advance to eliminate pecuniary interests, retain editorial control, and ensure independence. Analysts are compensated on a per report basis and not on the basis of his/her recommendations.
The information used and statements of fact made have been obtained from sources considered reliable but we neither guarantee nor represent the completeness or accuracy. Goldman Small Cap Research did not make an independent investigation or inquiry as to the accuracy of any information provided by the Company, or other firms. Goldman Small Cap Research relied solely upon information provided by the Company through its filings, press releases, presentations, and through its own internal due diligence for accuracy and completeness. Such information and the opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. A Goldman Small Cap Research blog, report, note, or newsletter is not intended as an offering, recommendation, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned or discussed.
This blog does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any particular person. This blog does not provide all information material to an investor’s decision about whether or not to make any investment. Any discussion of risks in this presentation is not a disclosure of all risks or a complete discussion of the risks mentioned. Neither Goldman Small Cap Research, nor its parent, is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser with FINRA or with any state securities regulatory authority.
ALL INFORMATION IN THIS BLOG, REPORT OR NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMISSIBLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, TWO TRIANGLE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE QUALITY, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, RELIABILITY OR TIMELINESS OF THIS INFORMATION, OR FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES THAT MAY ARISE OUT OF THE USE OF THIS INFORMATION BY YOU OR ANYONE ELSE (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF OPPORTUNITIES, TRADING LOSSES, AND DAMAGES THAT MAY RESULT FROM ANY INACCURACY OR INCOMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION). TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TWO TRIANGLE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE UNDER ANY TORT, CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, PRODUCTS LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION.
For more information, visit our Disclaimer: www.goldmanresearch.com